sam_gamgee: (Default)
[personal profile] sam_gamgee
Okay, so I'm really liking my classes this semester. The one problem I have this semester is my "History of Rock" professor. And it's more that one of his quirks drives me up the wall. He'll play songs for us to listen to to illustrate what he's been talking about and then as the song's playing, he'll start playing along with it on the piano to really emphasize what he's talking about. It's like, "*Okay* we *get* it!!!" I want to duct tape his hands together.

On the other hand, I love Bill, my lighting instructor. I've had him for some intro classes freshman year and he's great. He's probably what Marshall (from "Alias") will be like in, like, 30 years or something.

Ugh. I hate writing papers. Why do I have to write an *8-10* page analysis of three movies?

Okay, I was looking at what I wrote yesterday, and I think I might've used the wrong word. According to Merriam-Webster Online, a pederast (from which pederasty is derived) means "one that practices anal intercourse especially with a boy". So does that mean that you could use pederasty or variants thereof in the context of two adults and still have it be correct? *sigh* Now I'm confuzzled.

And I take back saying that "Miracles" is evil. It's a really good show (and on Monday nights at 10 on ABC). Just because David Greenwalt ("Angel") is an executive producer/showrunner (whatever that means), doesn't necessarily make it evil. (Although the case for it being evil because of that could be very easily made.)

I'm just not sure how to do this plot bunny. Or if I even should. Especially since the last thing I want is to promote pedophilia or anything like that. Would it work to have the two characters (keep in mind one's ~13/14 and the other's 20-something) become good friends in the first story and after knowing each other for a few years start to slowly fall in love and then in the second actually be able to act on it because the younger one is now of legal age? Keep in mind that both parties are completely consenting and neither says anything to the other. And the objective isn't to get them to bed each other or anything. Argh. The moral intricasies/ambiguities of this are way too hard to comprehend.

Date: 2003-03-11 03:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] libralyte.livejournal.com
okay. was obviously not refering to the libra boobies in the last two posts. stupid thing won't show anything other than my default. don't know why. wasting space. but am stressed is okay to waste space.
"But, I want you! And, dammit, I started it! You're so my bitch!"
"No. We can't. I'm too old to be your bitch."
[Error: Irreparable invalid markup ('<angst,>') in entry. Owner must fix manually. Raw contents below.]

okay. was obviously not refering to the libra boobies in the last two posts. stupid thing won't show anything other than my default. don't know why. wasting space. but am stressed is okay to waste space.
"But, I want you! And, dammit, I started it! You're so my bitch!"
"No. We can't. I'm too old to be your bitch." <angst, angst>

see, even in my addled state i came up with more.

Re:

Date: 2003-03-11 03:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sam-gamgee.livejournal.com
and then more angst. :0P

Profile

sam_gamgee: (Default)
sam_gamgee

September 2016

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 9th, 2025 06:51 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios