sam_gamgee: (Default)
[personal profile] sam_gamgee
Okay, so I'm really liking my classes this semester. The one problem I have this semester is my "History of Rock" professor. And it's more that one of his quirks drives me up the wall. He'll play songs for us to listen to to illustrate what he's been talking about and then as the song's playing, he'll start playing along with it on the piano to really emphasize what he's talking about. It's like, "*Okay* we *get* it!!!" I want to duct tape his hands together.

On the other hand, I love Bill, my lighting instructor. I've had him for some intro classes freshman year and he's great. He's probably what Marshall (from "Alias") will be like in, like, 30 years or something.

Ugh. I hate writing papers. Why do I have to write an *8-10* page analysis of three movies?

Okay, I was looking at what I wrote yesterday, and I think I might've used the wrong word. According to Merriam-Webster Online, a pederast (from which pederasty is derived) means "one that practices anal intercourse especially with a boy". So does that mean that you could use pederasty or variants thereof in the context of two adults and still have it be correct? *sigh* Now I'm confuzzled.

And I take back saying that "Miracles" is evil. It's a really good show (and on Monday nights at 10 on ABC). Just because David Greenwalt ("Angel") is an executive producer/showrunner (whatever that means), doesn't necessarily make it evil. (Although the case for it being evil because of that could be very easily made.)

I'm just not sure how to do this plot bunny. Or if I even should. Especially since the last thing I want is to promote pedophilia or anything like that. Would it work to have the two characters (keep in mind one's ~13/14 and the other's 20-something) become good friends in the first story and after knowing each other for a few years start to slowly fall in love and then in the second actually be able to act on it because the younger one is now of legal age? Keep in mind that both parties are completely consenting and neither says anything to the other. And the objective isn't to get them to bed each other or anything. Argh. The moral intricasies/ambiguities of this are way too hard to comprehend.

Date: 2003-03-11 03:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] libralyte.livejournal.com
fucking paper! i'm at two and a half pages. i need to go take a quiz or something. or eat more stress food.
to cheer you up, and me too:
"but i'm twenty four hours away from my 18th birthday!"
"no, you're underaged."
[Error: Irreparable invalid markup ('<angst,>') in entry. Owner must fix manually. Raw contents below.]

fucking paper! i'm at two and a half pages. i need to go take a quiz or something. or eat more stress food.
to cheer you up, and me too:
"but i'm twenty four hours away from my 18th birthday!"
"no, you're underaged." <angst, angst>

sorry, dear. was going to do a whole dialogue, but brain doesn't seem to want to work. that'll have to hold you. just pretend that my icon is jailbait. or think of frank and his hot blond jailbait boy-toy. and then of raymond. yum.

Re:

Date: 2003-03-11 03:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sam-gamgee.livejournal.com
Angst, angst, angst.

"but what about -"
"no!"

Angst, angst, angst.

:0P


and who the hell are frank and raymond?

Date: 2003-03-11 04:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] libralyte.livejournal.com
from far from heaven? you know who i mean.

Date: 2003-03-11 04:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sam-gamgee.livejournal.com
silly me.

how could i forget Frank and Raymond???

Date: 2003-03-11 03:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] libralyte.livejournal.com
sorry. thing is being stupid. here's pretty icon. (not that the other one isn't. but that's different.)

Date: 2003-03-11 03:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] libralyte.livejournal.com
okay. was obviously not refering to the libra boobies in the last two posts. stupid thing won't show anything other than my default. don't know why. wasting space. but am stressed is okay to waste space.
"But, I want you! And, dammit, I started it! You're so my bitch!"
"No. We can't. I'm too old to be your bitch."
[Error: Irreparable invalid markup ('<angst,>') in entry. Owner must fix manually. Raw contents below.]

okay. was obviously not refering to the libra boobies in the last two posts. stupid thing won't show anything other than my default. don't know why. wasting space. but am stressed is okay to waste space.
"But, I want you! And, dammit, I started it! You're so my bitch!"
"No. We can't. I'm too old to be your bitch." <angst, angst>

see, even in my addled state i came up with more.

Re:

Date: 2003-03-11 03:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sam-gamgee.livejournal.com
and then more angst. :0P

Re:

Date: 2003-03-11 03:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sam-gamgee.livejournal.com
lol...yes, v. pretty.

I'm now at 4 pgs.

Date: 2003-03-11 04:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] libralyte.livejournal.com
bitch!
[Error: Irreparable invalid markup ('<angst,>') in entry. Owner must fix manually. Raw contents below.]

bitch! <angst, angst> i only have 2 and a half done! but i stopped to watch the simpsons! why isn't it showing my little "angst, angst" things? i wrote that after the second sentances in my little sketches. and why's it back to the libra boobies? silly thing. must catch up...

Profile

sam_gamgee: (Default)
sam_gamgee

September 2016

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 8th, 2025 07:47 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios